Part of my day job involves following trends and predicting what might happen in the future of online education. Pretty risky business – I remember ten years ago when one article predicted that all colleges would one day have at least one class delivered online through AOL. A-O-Who? Do they still exist?
But despite the potential for immense embarrassment, I still find looking to possible futures fascinating (can you guess what my favorite genre of entertainment is?). I enjoy it so much that I wrote an article on what education could look like in 10 years, based on predictions of where technology is heading. The article is called “When the Future Finally Arrives: Web 2.0 Becomes Web 3.0” and it will be a chapter in a book called Web 2.0-based E-learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching
The great news is that chapter will be published next month. The bad news is that it took two years to get published, so a lot of what I say about Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 sounds pretty dated. This situation in itself exposes the weakness of publishing in traditional media. All of your cool, hip terms will become over-used cliches before your article gets printed.
I wish that I could just post the whole article here – I just proof-read it and I got pretty excited thinking about what the future could be like. Some of the topics covered are:
- Affordable media centers that have wide-screen, high definition, holographic, three-dimensional, multi-touch screen monitors, with cameras that can follow your movement to manipulate the display (like Minority Report) or respond to voice commands
- Classes that easily transfer back and forth from synchronous to asynchronous.
- Integrated systems – virtual worlds integrated with the web and each other, smart-phones integrated with desktops, etc.
- Greater use of tags to organize information with more accuracy.
- Better interaction between students and between the student and instructors.
- And finally, of course, really cool technology like three dimensional printers and scanners.
Much of what I wrote on is technology-focused. I realize that good pedagogy needs to come first in all educational situations… but if you think enough when you read it, you will see how I snuck a bunch of good pedagogy in there. If you do get to read it, I would recommend just skipping down to the section called “An Example of Online Learning 10 Years in the Future.” The rest of the stuff before that was just my attempt to sound scholarly and all that :)
That is to say – if you get to read it. This is the other problem with traditional media: this booked is pretty darn expensive. And I had to sign all my rights away to get it published, so I can put it on my blogs. I can always let people that live near me read the “draft” version that I printed up for proof-reading.
Matt is currently the Learning Innovation Coordinator with the UT Arlington LINK Research Lab. His research focuses on Learning Theory, Innovation, and learner empowerment. Matt holds a Ph.D. in Learning Technologies from the University of North Texas, a Master of Education in Educational Technology from UT Brownsville, and a Bachelors of Science in Education from Baylor University. His research interests include instructional design, learning pathways, sociocultural theory, heutagogy, virtual reality, and open networked learning. He has a background in instructional design and teaching at both the secondary and university levels and has been an active blogger and conference presenter. He also enjoys networking and collaborative efforts involving faculty, students, administration, and anyone involved in the education process.