EduGeek Journal

Proud Sponsor of Your Future

Tuesday, October 7, 2008 (12:12 pm)

Matt CrosslinA Case For Asynchronous Learning

Posted by: Matt Crosslin In: Pedagogy

One of the things you might have noticed about EGJ is that we don’t cover video conferencing very much. The truth is – there really isn’t that much to cover. Most video conferencing news is about better quality video or better connections. Which is pretty cool – but there is just not much more to say about that. Not to mention that this is also news about expensive products that we can’t afford to buy. For me personally, there is also another reason I don’t cover video conferencing very much: I don’t believe they have much of a place in online learning.

Sure, for making a presentation or lecture from a distance, they can be great. To me, active learning is the way to go for learning in general, so presentations and lectures should take up as little class time as possible. Students should interact, in my opinion. Some feel that video conferencing tool is also excellent for interaction. I would disagree with that thought. I feel that asynchronous learning methods are better for online learning.

To me, one of the weaknesses of online synchronous meetings is time. Synchronous meetings always have an extremely limited time factor

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

  • Share/Bookmark
Tags:

1 Response to "A Case For Asynchronous Learning"

Comment Form

Subscribe without commenting
E-Mail:

Welcome to EduGeek Journal

Welcome to EduGeek Journal, proud sponsor of your future. Our goal is to promote educational technology by helping educators stay one step ahead of Joneses. We like to pour over new ideas and dream about what could possibly happen in the future in the world of education.

Login



EduGeeks on Twitter



EduGeeks on Delicious

EduGeek Journal on Facebook

ClustrMap + Badges

Locations of visitors to this page