<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does &quot;Anytime, Anywhere Education&quot; Include Teachers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.edugeekjournal.com/2007/06/25/does-anytime-anywhere-education-include-teachers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.edugeekjournal.com/2007/06/25/does-anytime-anywhere-education-include-teachers/</link>
	<description>Proud Sponsor of Your Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:39:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Katrina Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.edugeekjournal.com/2007/06/25/does-anytime-anywhere-education-include-teachers/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Katrina Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edugeekjournal.com/?p=84#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Not that I&#039;ve heard about. The majority of our students work in business, so &#039;business days&#039; should be familiar to them. (We hope.) Even I, with my &#039;lowly&#039; edtech degree understand the phrase! ;) :D </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I&#8217;ve heard about. The majority of our students work in business, so &#8216;business days&#8217; should be familiar to them. (We hope.) Even I, with my &#8216;lowly&#8217; edtech degree understand the phrase! ;) :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Crosslin</title>
		<link>http://www.edugeekjournal.com/2007/06/25/does-anytime-anywhere-education-include-teachers/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Crosslin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edugeekjournal.com/?p=84#comment-113</guid>
		<description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt; isn&#039;t there something wrong with the academic program if a student is able to use the same paper for multiple courses?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Excellent point. That should be true in most colleges. But it probably isn&#039;t. There could also be an issue with transferred in courses. Especially in online education. Come to think of it, I think that was where I was having problems - between an elective from another university.&lt;br /&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-style: italic;"> isn&#8217;t there something wrong with the academic program if a student is able to use the same paper for multiple courses?</span></p>
<p>Excellent point. That should be true in most colleges. But it probably isn&#8217;t. There could also be an issue with transferred in courses. Especially in online education. Come to think of it, I think that was where I was having problems &#8211; between an elective from another university.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Crosslin</title>
		<link>http://www.edugeekjournal.com/2007/06/25/does-anytime-anywhere-education-include-teachers/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Crosslin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edugeekjournal.com/?p=84#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Have you ever found that professors need to clarify what &#039;business&#039; days means? Like: &#039;I sent you the question on Friday, and it&#039;s Monday and still no answer!&#039; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever found that professors need to clarify what &#8216;business&#8217; days means? Like: &#8216;I sent you the question on Friday, and it&#8217;s Monday and still no answer!&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Jennings</title>
		<link>http://www.edugeekjournal.com/2007/06/25/does-anytime-anywhere-education-include-teachers/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edugeekjournal.com/?p=84#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Heh - that sounds about right :) It would be nice if there were some middle ground in the rules... obviously there&#039;s a big difference between using a snippet of text from a previous assignment and just recycling the whole paper. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That brings up an interesting question, though: isn&#039;t there something wrong with the academic program if a student is able to use the same paper for multiple courses? Shouldn&#039;t there always be some sort of adaptation or elaboration required as the student progresses from course to course? And if there is -- it doesn&#039;t seem so wrong to me for that student to take what they&#039;ve already done and build upon it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My animation courses often encouraged that practice: I&#039;d write a story in one class, storyboard it in another, design the characters and sets in a third, etc, until I had a fully-developed animated short. It seems to me that the same model would apply well to the instructional design program at Capella, and probably any number of additional programs. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh &#8211; that sounds about right :) It would be nice if there were some middle ground in the rules&#8230; obviously there&#8217;s a big difference between using a snippet of text from a previous assignment and just recycling the whole paper. </p>
<p>That brings up an interesting question, though: isn&#8217;t there something wrong with the academic program if a student is able to use the same paper for multiple courses? Shouldn&#8217;t there always be some sort of adaptation or elaboration required as the student progresses from course to course? And if there is &#8212; it doesn&#8217;t seem so wrong to me for that student to take what they&#8217;ve already done and build upon it. </p>
<p>My animation courses often encouraged that practice: I&#8217;d write a story in one class, storyboard it in another, design the characters and sets in a third, etc, until I had a fully-developed animated short. It seems to me that the same model would apply well to the instructional design program at Capella, and probably any number of additional programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katrina Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.edugeekjournal.com/2007/06/25/does-anytime-anywhere-education-include-teachers/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Katrina Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edugeekjournal.com/?p=84#comment-110</guid>
		<description>The way we try to handle this situation is in the syllabus, the prof clearly states that s/he will respond to email within 2 business days. (Some profs choose one business day.) This sets students&#039; expectations from the very beginning of the class. And at least nine times out of ten, the prof usually responds much, much quicker than this. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way we try to handle this situation is in the syllabus, the prof clearly states that s/he will respond to email within 2 business days. (Some profs choose one business day.) This sets students&#8217; expectations from the very beginning of the class. And at least nine times out of ten, the prof usually responds much, much quicker than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Crosslin</title>
		<link>http://www.edugeekjournal.com/2007/06/25/does-anytime-anywhere-education-include-teachers/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Crosslin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edugeekjournal.com/?p=84#comment-109</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed that those that are in favor of re-using previous work call it &#039;self-recycling,&#039; and those that are against it call it &#039;self-plagiarizing.&#039; :)&lt;br /&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that those that are in favor of re-using previous work call it &#8217;self-recycling,&#8217; and those that are against it call it &#8217;self-plagiarizing.&#8217; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin Jennings</title>
		<link>http://www.edugeekjournal.com/2007/06/25/does-anytime-anywhere-education-include-teachers/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edugeekjournal.com/?p=84#comment-108</guid>
		<description>I have read of an online program that provides teaching assistants/student mentors as additional resources. They decrease the response time on student questions and emails and take some of the pressure off the instructor. I can&#039;t remember where I read about it, but I&#039;ll check my course materials when I get home and try to find it. It seemed like a good system, especially for education courses where the teaching assistant gains practical experience by assisting with the class.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for reusing previous work, Capella University treats it as cheating. I ran into a case this quarter where I wanted to take a project from a previous course and develop it further for another (by taking a proposal for a course and fleshing it out into storyboards and budgets), but even that seemed to fall under cheating in their guidelines. I understand the principle behind the rule, but I think we could make legitimate arguments in support of both our cases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read of an online program that provides teaching assistants/student mentors as additional resources. They decrease the response time on student questions and emails and take some of the pressure off the instructor. I can&#8217;t remember where I read about it, but I&#8217;ll check my course materials when I get home and try to find it. It seemed like a good system, especially for education courses where the teaching assistant gains practical experience by assisting with the class.</p>
<p>As for reusing previous work, Capella University treats it as cheating. I ran into a case this quarter where I wanted to take a project from a previous course and develop it further for another (by taking a proposal for a course and fleshing it out into storyboards and budgets), but even that seemed to fall under cheating in their guidelines. I understand the principle behind the rule, but I think we could make legitimate arguments in support of both our cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Crosslin</title>
		<link>http://www.edugeekjournal.com/2007/06/25/does-anytime-anywhere-education-include-teachers/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Crosslin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edugeekjournal.com/?p=84#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Oh - and just to say - as a former online student, I totally support instructors having a life. If it takes several days to get a response, I am fine with that. If I ever get to a spot where I have to have an answer in less time that that, then I feel that is poor planning on my part. But that is just my opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh &#8211; and just to say &#8211; as a former online student, I totally support instructors having a life. If it takes several days to get a response, I am fine with that. If I ever get to a spot where I have to have an answer in less time that that, then I feel that is poor planning on my part. But that is just my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
