Comments on: Wikis in Plain English http://www.edugeekjournal.com/2007/06/06/wikis-in-plain-english/ Proud Sponsor of Your Future Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:41:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Matt Crosslin http://www.edugeekjournal.com/2007/06/06/wikis-in-plain-english/comment-page-1/#comment-98 Matt Crosslin Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:21:57 +0000 http://www.edugeekjournal.com/?p=74#comment-98 I do like it, in all it's low-tech glory. Great way to answer that "what is this Wiki thing you're talking about?" question. I do like it, in all it’s low-tech glory. Great way to answer that “what is this Wiki thing you’re talking about?” question.

]]> By: Katrina Adams http://www.edugeekjournal.com/2007/06/06/wikis-in-plain-english/comment-page-1/#comment-96 Katrina Adams Thu, 07 Jun 2007 07:13:53 +0000 http://www.edugeekjournal.com/?p=74#comment-96 They probably left that out just to keep the explanation as simple as possible. I was impressed with it b/c even though it's kind of silly, it's very clear. They probably left that out just to keep the explanation as simple as possible. I was impressed with it b/c even though it’s kind of silly, it’s very clear.

]]> By: Matt Crosslin http://www.edugeekjournal.com/2007/06/06/wikis-in-plain-english/comment-page-1/#comment-95 Matt Crosslin Thu, 07 Jun 2007 07:02:18 +0000 http://www.edugeekjournal.com/?p=74#comment-95 Oh.... wow. Funny how they make fun of email being the 'old way' of doing something, when they are using stop motion movie capture (pioneered in the late 1800s) for special effects. :)<br /><br />One thing they didn't go into was the ability to look at older versions. They could have looked at it as 'one user sees that food was taken off of the need list and never moved to the have list. This seemed like as obvious error. They went back to see who did that, and found that Bob was up to his old tricks!'<br /> Oh…. wow. Funny how they make fun of email being the ‘old way’ of doing something, when they are using stop motion movie capture (pioneered in the late 1800s) for special effects. :)

One thing they didn’t go into was the ability to look at older versions. They could have looked at it as ‘one user sees that food was taken off of the need list and never moved to the have list. This seemed like as obvious error. They went back to see who did that, and found that Bob was up to his old tricks!’

]]>